To build a benchmarking analysis for MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) to Internet Broadband migration with a focus on cost savings and avoidance, we can follow a structured approach. This analysis will compare the cost, performance, and value of using MPLS versus Internet broadband (such as SD-WAN solutions) for enterprise-level connectivity. Below is the step-by-step approach to this analysis:
Step-by-Step Approach:
1. Define Key Metrics for Comparison
To compare MPLS with Internet Broadband, establish the key metrics that are essential to benchmarking:
Cost per Mbps: Cost of bandwidth for MPLS vs. broadband internet.
Total Bandwidth: Available bandwidth capacity for both technologies.
Latency: The average delay in communication.
Reliability/Uptime: Measured in percentage uptime.
Support & Maintenance Costs: Costs related to managing MPLS vs broadband solutions.
Security and Compliance Costs: For MPLS, which is typically more secure, and the need for SD-WAN or other tools to secure broadband.
Additional Features: MPLS features like QoS (Quality of Service) vs broadband's flexibility.
Migration Costs: The one-time cost of migrating from MPLS to Internet Broadband.
Cost Avoidance: Expected future savings, such as avoiding additional MPLS links.
2. Cost Calculation
We'll compare both upfront and recurring costs. Here’s how you can break them down:
MPLS Costs:
Fixed costs for each site (monthly service charge).
Costs per Mbps of bandwidth.
Setup and maintenance costs.
Vendor support costs.
Broadband/SD-WAN Costs:
Cost per Mbps of bandwidth.
SD-WAN hardware, software, and licensing costs.
Management and monitoring costs.
Any incremental costs (e.g., redundancy setups).
3. Scalability
Internet Broadband offers better scalability compared to MPLS:
Broadband: Easy to scale with additional bandwidth at a lower cost.
MPLS: Limited scalability due to high bandwidth costs and complex provisioning.
4. Service Availability & Uptime
MPLS generally guarantees higher uptime (often 99.9%+).
Internet Broadband can be enhanced with SD-WAN, allowing for high availability through redundancy.
5. Security Considerations
MPLS: Secure, private network by design.
Broadband: Needs additional security solutions (e.g., VPN, SD-WAN security features).
6. Performance Comparison
Latency and jitter comparison between MPLS and broadband networks.
Impact of network congestion on performance.
7. Cost Avoidance with Migration
Calculate savings by avoiding future MPLS expansions, upgrades, or renewals.
Estimate the cost of avoiding downtime by improving redundancy with broadband solutions.
8. Cost Savings from Migration
Upfront savings: Reduction in monthly connectivity costs (MPLS to broadband).
Ongoing savings: Reduced reliance on expensive leased lines (MPLS).
Efficiency gains: Higher bandwidth availability at lower costs.
9. Benchmarking Framework Example in Excel
We can set up a detailed comparison using the metrics above, creating a table where we compare the different elements of cost and performance for both MPLS and broadband solutions.
Would you like me to generate an Excel template for this benchmarking analysis? This template would allow you to input your specific numbers (costs, bandwidth, etc.), and the spreadsheet would calculate the cost savings, cost avoidance, and other comparative metrics automatically.
コメント